15 Feb
2005
15 Feb
'05
2:16 a.m.
"Jason Hise" wrote:
Rob Stewart wrote:
template <typename T> class unsafe_singleton : public singleton<T> { public: //! WARNING: Do not delete the returned pointer! T * unsafe_get() { return this; } };
That's manageable, I can add that.
Maybe function template<.....> T* unsafe_get_pointer(singleton<T>::pointer&) { ... } would be enough. Having one more class for just one function feels as overkill. Local need for raw pointer should not mean possibly global change in design. /Pavel