David Abrahams writes:
"Jonathan Turkanis" <technews@kangaroologic.com> writes:
"Robert Ramey" <ramey@rrsd.com> wrote in message news:20040913173738.24EAC3123A@acme.west.net...
Would someone have a fit if something like this were added to boost/mpl ?
template< typename C , typename F1 , typename F2 > struct apply_if { typedef BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME eval_if<C,F1,F2>::type type; };
How about
template< typename C , typename F1 , typename F2 > struct apply_if : eval_if<C,F1,F2> { };
Metafunction forwarding confuses some old broken compilers. Robert's version is a bit more conservative.
But, really, how hard can a global search/replace be? Or is Spirit 1.6.1 archived?
No, it's not. Or, to be exact, the latest 1.6.x version which we are supposed to compile against is not -- http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.parsers.spirit.devel/1964. I'd _much_ prefer to have this fixed by search & replace, more so because it'd have to be done eventually sooner or later anyway, if Spirit 1.6.x is meant to live past this release. -- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering