on Sun Dec 09 2012, Jookia <166291-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
On 09/12/12 01:04, Beman Dawes wrote:
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Oliver Kowalke <oliver.kowalke@gmail.com> wrote: Modular Boost + Git has enough advantages that it is worth doing regardless of what happens in the future. But the intent is to continue work on further infrastructure improvements, for sure. The specifics will evolve over time, but cmake interest continues to be strong.
--Beman
Is there a current discussion on moving to CMake?
Not much discussion, but...
Or a status?
...Work in progress. You can experiment with the CMake port today (https://github.com/ryppl/boost-zero). Some tests still need to be ported to CMake. To automatically fetch dependencies, you'll want ryppl, which needs some work but is mostly functional. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing Software Development Training http://www.boostpro.com Clang/LLVM/EDG Compilers C++ Boost