5 Nov
2011
5 Nov
'11
4:17 p.m.
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Peter Dimov <pdimov@pdimov.com> wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
well, is the expected behavior. Every smart pointer tries to mimic raw pointers and the constructor ambiguity reduces this similarity. I also > don't want to update my code when it breaks.
What's the problem with updating your code?
It's not fun, especially when the cause is a component that has been stable for what, a decade now?
Are you using explicit construction with NULL or 0? If so, maybe you could tell us why you're doing that instead of using the default constructor? -- Olaf