29 Nov
2004
29 Nov
'04
10:19 p.m.
David Abrahams wrote:
Daniel Frey wrote:
Inspired by that, how about simply writing
std::Boost
OK, select a nice font, colors, etc., but also the plain text representation is possible and IMHO communicates well where Boost aims at.
Because it doesn't suggest that Boost leads to standardization the way my submission does.
Yours implies this theme, too
?? I know that mine implies the theme that Boost leads to standardization. I was claiming yours doesn't.
Oh, I misunderstood that. But why doesn't std::Boost imply that Boost libraries (at least some) aim to become part of the standard (that is namespace std::)? Or why is Boostd:: (given the colorized logo) better than std::Boost (logo or text)? Regards, Daniel