Re: [boost] Name and Namespace for Potential Boost Extended Floating-Point

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Christopher Kormanyos <e_float@yahoo.com>wrote:

From: Steven Watanabe <watanabesj@gmail.com>

To: boost@lists.boost.org Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 9:19 PM Subject: Re: [boost] Name and Namespace for Potential Boost Extended Floating-Point

I'm against mp. It's too close to mpl.

In Christ, Steven Watanabe

We also found "mp" to be too terse and non-intuitive. Thank you. You're right. It is too close to mpl.

It's too close to mpi too... :) - Jeff