Hi, As some others have mentioned, I'd like to ask if Boost.Move and Boost.Container could meet the requirements for a Fast Track review (the Review Wizard has the last word according to the Boost Formal Process, but I'll like to see if there is consensus). Arguments: Boost.Move -> Only one header (move.hpp) -> Technique already in use in Boost (in several detail namespaces). This is a proposal for a common implementation. -> Boost-conformant implementation available in sandbox. Boost.Container -> Most of them standard containers -> Node containers are just wrappers over Boost.Intrusive -> Most containers (all except stable_vector) were already reviewed for Boost.Interprocess. -> Boost-conformant implementation available in sandbox. I'll be specially interested in pushing Move first, so that we could have move semantics for Boost 1.41. Best, Ion