3 Jul
2009
3 Jul
'09
10:48 p.m.
John Maddock wrote:
Folks,
Some time ago we made is_base_of<int,int>::value true, for reasons that escape me, and the TR1 followed this.
However, C++0X makes is_base_of<non_class, non_class>::value to be false, which seems all round more logical to me.
Not only that but I would have intuitively thought that is_base_of<> would always be false if either template parameter is a non-class type.