From: David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com>
"Jonathan Turkanis" <technews@kangaroologic.com> writes:
Reid Sweatman wrote:
It might be salvable, though. I liked it a lot, just thought it too close. Got to looking more closely and noticed that you can (if you [snip] eliminating the half closest to the "ship." Just suggestions. It's the flu meds, y'know? I'm a zombie right now.
It would be easier to follow if you would post some examples.
Most definitely. That also doesn't fit the minor alterations theme I proposed.
But it would have been my first choice, too; ought to be some way to rework it while keeping the essence.
Unfortunately, the contest is closed now. I don't think we can open up one of the logos for major redesign without doing it for the others.
Maybe we should do that. We've learned a lot since this started.
Since most of the submitters aren't graphic artists, they have learned a lot from the discussion, too. I'd really like to see a number of the logos reworked.
We can always give an extra award to cover our learning experience if any logo designers would feel cheated.
Do you mean forcibly select the best from the current crop plus start a new round to select the real logo? I guess that would work. -- Rob Stewart stewart@sig.com Software Engineer http://www.sig.com Susquehanna International Group, LLP using std::disclaimer;