On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 01:58:06PM +0200, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
"Pavol Droba" <droba@topmail.sk> wrote in message news:20040929104310.GY29008@lenin.felcer.sk... | On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 09:33:23AM +0200, Thorsten Ottosen wrote: | >
| > copy_range<string>( *it ) should do the work. | > | | Actualy I thought, that we may add a member function to the iterator range. | So that the syntax would be like: | | it->copy<string>();
Inside a dependent type context this would be
it-> template copy<string>();
I think. besides, I don't like the idea of adding more stuff to iterator_range. The Pavol Droba I knew used to be a proponent of free-standing functions :-)
Oh yeah. That was probably just one of ideas that just popped up in my mind and never should get out of it. I was little bit misleaded by Gennadiy's effort to simplify the handling. This is obviously not the way. Regards, Pavol.