Re: [boost] [Fit] formal review - should we propose some parts to Boost.Config/Boost.Core

On 2016-03-06 05:21, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:

Others could be considered also as function.hpp, lambda.hpp and lift.hpp, as the macros are there to workaround some missing language features, but those are much more specialized (Boost.Core?)

I don't think Boost.Core is the right place for them as this library is for small generally useful components used by many libraries. The components you pointed out seem too specialized to me, and Boost.Fit looks like the right place for them.