On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Paul Mensonides <pmenso57@comcast.net>wrote:
On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 15:49:40 -0400, Edward Diener wrote:
2) For a macro library, do we still need to have a BOOST_ prefix or could I just keep the CHAOS_PP_ prefix? I cannot use BOOST_PP_ without bending over backwards to find contrived names for everything, and the namespace of brief names beginning with BOOST_ is tiny--especially when a library provides hundreds of user-interface (i.e. not implementation detail macros).
BOOST_CHAOS_PP_... seems normal to me.
It seems *way* to long to me.
BOOST_CH_... Like BOOST_PP stands for Boost.PreProcessor, BOOST_CH could stand for BOOST_CHAOS /bikeshed -- gpd
-Paul
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost