On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 12:25 PM Janek Kozicki via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
How about this :)
Mateusz Loskot via Boost said: (by the date of Sat, 22 Aug 2020
20:46:16 +0200)
On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 at 20:38, Vinnie Falco via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 9:48 AM Andrey Semashev via Boost <
boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Vinnie, please stop posting messages with clickbait or obscure topics. This is not going to help you find a review manager, quite the opposite.
My DEEPEST apologies for the transgression. But maybe... just a thought here, you could forgive me seeing as to how I have been asking for a review manager for 10 months now?
If a review manager can submit a review, precedents in the past are known, then, perhaps, a review wizard can be a review manager ;)
One way or another, I believe there is room for further clarification of the review rules.
Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
As far as I am concerned, the review manager must have deep understanding of the problem domain and not be in a position to gain from either acceptance or rejection. The review wizards' approval certifies that that's the case. Technically, as long as it _is_ the case, I don't see why a wizard can't be a manager.