25 Oct
2012
25 Oct
'12
4:10 p.m.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Matthew Chambers <matt.chambers42@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm forwarding this from the boost-build list to get a broader perspective from boost users and probably also some Boost.Build users that don't monitor that list.
How many agree with Steven that for <variant>debug: "The libraries that are built need to be ABI compatible with code that isn't compiled using Boost.Build."
How many would sacrifice ABI compatibility in order for <runtime-debugging>on to actually do something for GCC?
Why not create a new variant for this eh, variant? Olaf