30 May
2008
30 May
'08
8:16 p.m.
"vicente.botet" <vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> writes:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthony Williams" <anthony.ajw@gmail.com>
OK. This is similar to what I've done with detail::future_waiter. I could probably extend it to provide a full future that had the semantics of the future_or I posted earlier. I'll have a look next week.
Do you mean that future_waiter will be public and not a implementation detail?
I mean that something based on future_waiter would be public, yes. Anthony -- Anthony Williams | Just Software Solutions Ltd Custom Software Development | http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk Registered in England, Company Number 5478976. Registered Office: 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL