10 Sep
2011
10 Sep
'11
7:23 p.m.
On Sep 10, 2011, at 11:06 AM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
Does this respond to your expectations?
Yes!
My first proposal of Boost.Chrono included Stopwatches, but some on this list sugested that i would be better to split the library :(
That design still has merit, but -
If no body is agains I will move Boost.Stopwatches to the namespace boost::chrono, remove the reporting facilities, and find a date for a review.
My point was that since you own Chrono you can add whatever you want to it. So you could get something distributed now and see about a review later. But perhaps I'm the only one thinking the need for a Boost.Timer replacement is urgent. Cheers, Gordon