"Jeff Flinn" <TriumphSprint2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:ci9qjr$ogt$1@sea.gmane.org... | | "David Abrahams" <dave@boost-consulting.com> wrote in message | news:uk6uvle5e.fsf@boost-consulting.com... | > "Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto@cs.auc.dk> writes: | | > I wonder whether it's better to say | > | > cbegin(x) | > | > or | > | > begin(as_const(x)) | > | > The latter is certainly more general. | | Does this imply that the following would be possible: | | begin( as_reverse(x) ) rbegin(x) is alreeady there as a parallel to x.rbegin(). | begin( as_const( as_reverse(x) ) ) | begin( as_reverse( as_const(x) ) ) yes, I think so with some metaprgramming, but its getting quite hard to read compared to the single version. br Thorsten