14 Jun
2009
14 Jun
'09
9:37 p.m.
Peter Dimov wrote:
Sohail Somani:
Peter Dimov wrote:
Sohail Somani:
If the boost::placeholders namespace was to exist, I was suggesting that boost standardize on the placeholders in that namespace.
OK, but what does this mean in the short term? What shoud we do with the immediate problem of bind's global placeholders?
I'd suggest a less "global" namespace to put them into. boost::bindns::placeholders ?
Well... and how does this achieve the goal of having "unified" placeholders in namespace boost::placeholders?
Your question was what to do with the immediate problem of bind's global placeholders... That was what I was responding to. -- Sohail Somani http://uint32t.blogspot.com