[boost] Re: [fsm] Why exit actions must not fail

Andreas Huber wrote:

BTW, as pointed out by someone else the user *does* have a choice. If she happens to have an exit action that she'd rather not have executed upon destruction then she can always transform the machine part in question such that her action is executed as part of a transition action instead (I would consider it a design error not to do so).

This obviously still links destruction with termination. So, a user is still stuck when she absolutely wants to have some actions to be run on termination but not on destruction. For this purpose, a destructing() function could be introduced. However, I think it is a good idea to add this only if users ask for it. Regards, Andreas