2 May
2010
2 May
'10
6:06 p.m.
On 2 May 2010 13:57, Chad Nelson <chad.thecomfychair@gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry, but I'm confused. How would that be different from what the library is doing now?
Semantically? It wouldn't. It just means you're leaving the thread safety choices up to the user by providing the same guarantees that just about every type in the standard and boost offer: Independent instances can be used independently, shared instances need mutex. Leave it up to the user whether they want thread-specific random, mutexed random, task-queue-controlled random, whatever.