9 Feb
2004
9 Feb
'04
10:30 p.m.
David Abrahams wrote: [...]
thrown (or may be something equivalent to 'unexpected'). If it is derived from a declared one, it will be sliced.
Is everyone convinced that propagating the exception into the joining thread is the right behavior or even semantically sensible?
I'm convinced that propagating *unexpected* exceptions into the joining thread is totally wrong and insensible. regards, alexander.