Since you're using ODBC, theoretically you can just bind your library to any RDBMS supporting ODBC ? On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Jean-Louis Leroy <jl@yorel.be> wrote:
This version features : * insert...set syntax (but no insert...select yet) * update [where] * delete from [where] * create and drop follow the same syntax pattern as the others * attempts to simplify the internals (in insert - select still needs a second look) * some concept checks
It's *beginning* to look like something one could use in simple real apps. What's missing before it qualifies is imo `like', 'exists' and transactions. That should not take long.
This version compiles with msvc9 and gcc 4.4.1. I tested on Win32 with an Access db via ODBC. The sql engine tests pass on Linux but I have not tried the ODBC test suite on Unix yet. If somebody tries it, please tell me.
I have changed the naming scheme : first number is major revision ; second is the milestone (crud with direct execution ; transactions ; prepared statements ; dialects ; constraints ; dynamic sql - which btw I am now nearly sure I can fit elegantly in my framework ; views). Third number is just there for getting ++'ed.
The test suite is still the doc but after the transactions I'll begin documenting. Probably with QuickBook.
It's funny to see that some people are still downloading 0.04. As I write this the downlaod count bumped to 21 :-D To avoid confusion due to the change in the versioning scheme I deleted the old versions.
J-L
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
-- Alp Mestan http://blog.mestan.fr/ http://alp.developpez.com/