6 Apr
2019
6 Apr
'19
6:14 p.m.
On Sat, Apr 6, 2019, 1:11 PM Robert Ramey via Boost
On 4/6/19 9:46 AM, John Maddock via Boost wrote:
One thing we could look at for future releases would be to provide differently-named binaries for /Qspectre. Anyone else have thoughts on that?
Hmmm - I question I'm too lazy to investigate so I'll just ask you. Does boost build not provide the option of specifying that the invocation specify the name of the binaries or perhaps some root? Would this not get boost off the hook for addressing special requirements like this?
Yes, both of those features are available.