Douglas Gregor wrote:
|python| bases: gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc builtin_converters: gcc-3.4.5_linux gcc-4.0.3_linux gcc-4.1.0_linux gcc-4.1.0_linux_x86_64 crossmod_exception: gcc-3.2.3_linux gcc-3.3.6_linux gcc-3.4.5_linux gcc-3.4.5_linux_x86_64 gcc-4.0.3_linux gcc-4.1.0_linux gcc-4.1.0_linux_x86_64 intel-linux-9.0 crossmod_opaque: gcc-3.2.3_linux gcc-3.3.6_linux gcc-3.4.5_linux gcc-3.4.5_linux_x86_64 gcc-4.0.3_linux gcc-4.1.0_linux gcc-4.1.0_linux_x86_64 intel-linux-9.0 exec: gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc exec-dynamic: gcc-3.4.5_linux gcc-4.0.3_linux gcc-4.1.0_linux gcc-4.1.0_linux_x86_64 gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc import_: cw-9.4 gcc-4.1.0_linux_x86_64 gcc-mingw-3.4.2 gcc-mingw-3.4.5 intel-vc71-win-9.1 msvc-6.5 msvc-6.5 msvc-6.5_stlport4 msvc-7.0 msvc-7.1 msvc-7.1 msvc-7.1 msvc-7.1_stlport4 msvc-8.0 msvc-8.0 msvc-8.0 iterator: gcc-3.2.3_linux gcc-3.3.6_linux gcc-3.4.5_linux gcc-3.4.5_linux_x86_64 gcc-4.0.3_linux gcc-4.1.0_linux gcc-4.1.0_linux_x86_64 intel-linux-9.0 map_indexing_suite: gcc-3.4.5_linux gcc-4.0.3_linux gcc-4.1.0_linux gcc-4.1.0_linux_x86_64 pointee: gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc pointer_type_id_test: gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc try: gcc-3.2.3_linux gcc-3.3.6_linux gcc-3.4.5_linux gcc-3.4.5_linux_x86_64 gcc-4.0.3_linux gcc-4.1.0_linux gcc-4.1.0_linux_x86_64 intel-linux-9.0 upcast: gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc
I didn't find any answer when I asked the last time, so I'm asking again: What is the meaning of the absolute number of 'regressions' ? Did this number really go up from the last report to the current one ? At least some 'new' ones stem from the inclusion of the 'gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc' test run in this report, which wasn't present in the last. What determines the test runs that make it into a report ? Is this sunos platform really a primary platform for this release ? Why wasn't it tested before ? How are we ever going to get the number of unexpected failures down to zero ? I honestly don't believe it will ever happen, if we continue like that. :-( May I suggest to fix a number of 'primary platforms' (and that may well translate to specific testers, at this point in the release process), and just disregard anything else ? Thanks, Stefan -- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...