On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Lorenzo Caminiti <lorcaminiti@gmail.com>wrote:
For example, I _think_ (but I've not implemented this yet) that I can simplify the syntax like this:
Looks good, I use pretty much exactly the same syntax in my library concerning parameter lists and templates ( https://github.com/boostcon/2011_presentations/raw/master/thu/Boost.Generic.... slides 79 and 96 are okay examples). The only thing I'm confused about is how you specify the return type of your CONTRACT_FUNCTION -- in particular, you did not wrap it in parentheses. Are you really able to do that, or is that a mistake? If that syntax is indeed possible, then I'd like to see the implementation because I too would love to be able to rid myself of some parentheses. -- -Matt Calabrese