-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 04 May 2008 09:09 am, Daniel Frey wrote:
Oops, it lacked an ADL protector (see the corrected version attached). This shows that the current regression tests do not catch this problem (it was triggered by libs/signals/src/connection.cpp for example). Which raises the question whether or not the specification should allow an ADL protector. Personally, I would like to see that, even that it's required. Opinions?
What is an ADL protector? I'm not familiar with that idea. I see you added a namespace and a using statement, but what problem does it solve? - -- Frank -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIHyQ25vihyNWuA4URArZJAKCFGFYq51FhqNmFutKotNG1pv8SNwCeOMx0 OJHBlU8azHXaPBD7aMWSy1s= =sPGN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----