3 Mar
2004
3 Mar
'04
7:45 p.m.
David Turner wrote:
Have you considered the 'on_delete', 'on_change' naming scheme for signals (events)? It seems more GUI/RAD-like.
Yes, but I think I'd rather name it after what it is (delete_signal) than after when it happens (on_delete).
Well, the assumption is that we all will know that on_* is a signal, so there'd be no need to explicitly tag it as one. 'on_click' and 'on_change' seem more natural to me compared to 'clicked_signal' and 'changed_signal', and the on_* naming seems more consistent. It's a minor point, of course.