Re: [boost] [rfc] Quadrature library for numerical integrationofdefinite integrals

Hugo Duncan wrote:

One of the questions I pondered was whether I should use Boost.Parameter or not. In the end I opted to use it, and I think it works well. Using thirteen parameters does however slow the compiler quite significantly. There is also a slight clash with the Math toolkit library in the vault, in that it unconditionaly defines BOOST_PARAMETER_MAX_ARITY to a smaller value.

That define has been removed from the Math Toolkit code in SVN.

BTW, just noticed that math toolkit is in SVN - will it be in the next boost release?

Yep :-) John.