Am Donnerstag, 20. November 2008 15:37:10 schrieb vicente.botet:
Hi,
The Anthony Future + Packaged task proposals have been adopted by the C++ Standard.
good you post a link to this information, please.
Is there a sense to review both Futures libraries together? Can we accept the Braddock library if it not conforms to the standard?
That's the question - Braddocks Future library has more features (callback functionality).
As the interface and the design rationale for libraries already adopted by the C++ Standard such Chrono seem to be out of the scope of a review, which is the contents expected for such libraries to be adopted? Do we need a different review process?
BTW, the threadpool library uses Braddock Future library.
I can easily exchange the future implementation - chaining tasks and lazy task evaluation will not be available with the lib from Anthony. reagards, Oliver