20 Jan
2008
20 Jan
'08
11:11 a.m.
John Maddock <john <at> johnmaddock.co.uk> writes: Nice :(
but again I suspect this depends on whether you implement TR1 or track the latest std WP
I'll ask what their intentions are.
(which I believe can't be implemented without rvalue references).
I ran into that when i was looking at a test failure with add_reference<void> (the Beta MS TR1 won't compile it) - the WP clarifies that void should be supported, but also replaces add_reference with add_(rvalue/lvalue)_reference. Still, at least i'm learning more about how all this stuff works while testing it! Thanks, Richard Webb