"Paul A. Bristow" <pbristow@hetp.u-net.com> writes:
-----Original Message----- From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Edward Diener Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2014 7:10 AM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] Once accepted, when does a library undergo further review?
On 1/3/2014 11:56 PM, Richard wrote:
[Please do not mail me a copy of your followup]
boost@lists.boost.org spake the secret code <CAAygHNN5K_G55W8PH6uLHD5aXQOoZChA=2ianHR8dW89RMj36w@mail.gmail.com> thusly:
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Richard <legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com>wrote:
However, once a library has been accepted, it doesn't seem to go through any more peer review.
In other words, once a library has been accepted into Boost, what prevents that library from suffering from "code rot"?
Can I suggest that Boost.Test be placed in 'community care'?
+1. Some weeks ago I was arguing that Boost shouldn't treat maintainer status as a binary. Some important libraries have maintainers who are just-not-quite-absent. Alex -- Swish - Easy SFTP for Windows Explorer (http://www.swish-sftp.org)