[boost] Re: null

Angus Leeming wrote:

The point of the article still holds, I think. You have your NULL class. Does it help here? Don't think so...

void f(string *); void f(foo *); f(NULL);

What if there were a template version of null added? For instance: void f ( int * ); void f ( char * ); f ( null<int> ); Would this solve the ambiguity, or is there something else that I am missing? -Jason