23 May
2010
23 May
'10
11:58 a.m.
At Sat, 22 May 2010 17:00:13 +0200, vicente.botet wrote:
I see that there is not too much participation on the review of this library. Either people is not interested on Move semantics (I doubt), either they are interested but they have an implementation provided by some compilers in C++0x.
I'm quite interested but I'm buried in ryppl development ATM. -- Dave Abrahams Meet me at BoostCon: http://www.boostcon.com BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com