Re: [boost] Proposal for moving Boost to CMake

On 6/16/17 7:25 PM, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Robert Ramey via Boost wrote:

...

Documentation has to be standards conforming. That is it would have to describe libraries in terms of valid expressions rather than implementation

Are you saying that a description of valid expressions is the only good way to document a library?

I am.

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost