On 7/4/2011 1:54 PM, Robert Ramey wrote:
Mathias Gaunard wrote:
A GSoC student and I are currently converting a library to use the namespace boost::simd.
Some of the implementation details of the library are not simd-specific, and we would like to use them in some other libraries that extend boost::simd.
[...]
Would it be ok to put them in the boost::detail namespace, or is that considered as bad as putting stuff in the boost namespace?
I think we want to move away from including anything in boost::detail. Consider making you're "sublibrary" as
boost::smid::sublibrary.
Should the sublibrary attract wider interest so it might be considered promotion, all you'll have to do is do a global replace boost::smid::sublibrary<- boost::sublibrary. In fact, if you've used "using" judiciously in your code even that would be trivial.
+1 -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail