on Tue Sep 02 2008, "Giovanni Piero Deretta" <gpderetta-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
You're missing my point. Are you indeed making such stacks? If so, what are you doing with them?
The deepest stack I have in my application is 4 adapters deep. The reasons I do not have deeper stack are:
1) compile time cost 2) lack of auto and decltype for easy factorization (need to 'reify' the ranges at function boundaries) 3) lack of time to make additional lazy wrappers for standard algorithm.
I expect that with a C++0x compiler 1 [*] and 2 won't be a problem, while RangeEx should take care of 3.
The usage is in a real world text processing heavy application.
Great, but what are you doing with these stacks? Normally, the answer would be something like "I'm applying the X algorithm to a range of elements that represent Y but have been adapted to look like Z" -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com