Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
Le 19/11/11 23:08, Lorenzo Caminiti a écrit :
... FYI, I can write pp code that transforms void, this_, etc into lambda captures. For example:
TO_CAPTURE(void) // expand to [] TO_CAPTURE(this_,&x) // expand to [this,&x] TO_CAPTURE( (this_) (&x) ) // expand to [this,&x]
This way SCOPE_EXIT(void) and SCOPE_EXIT( (this_) (&x) ) or even SCOPE_EXIT(this_,&x) could support void and this_ while still working on both C++03 and C++11...
- For the same reason, const bind& and bind& should be removed from the interface. Well, if local exits are not merged with scope exits, local exits can keep const bind&, bind&, this_, void, etc.
... Alex, could you explain why (a part form following the lambda capture), you don't want to accept these new bindings in ScopedExit?
Because binding syntax in Local is not compatible with ScopeExit captures. If Lorenzo can add support for this_ and void extensions (with emphasis on extensions), I'd be fine with this. Alex