Re: [boost] Anyone interested in a generic loop (and loop unrolling) library ?

Hui Li wrote:

Loops, in particular loop-unrolling, can be made generic, easy to write, and accessible to everybody. With the help of Boost.Lambda (and a few other boost libraries), we can easily construct arbitrary loops that are unrolled at compile-time.

Can you clarify exactly what you're trying to achieve? I don't think that loops, in general, and hard-to-write and not accessible to everybody. And speaking about loop unrolling -- the whole point of that is performance -- did you measure performance of the code using your approach and traditional code with suitable optimizations? - Volodya