On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Oswin Krause < Oswin.Krause@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> wrote:
I am going to vote for conditional acceptance under the condition of a consensus on the scope of the library(i.e. I am not going to stand in the way if the boost community sees it as sufficient if QVM is a pure glue between more powerful libraries). If the scope is intended to be broader than "glue code" I would like to hear about a roadmap for what is going to be added or how the library author envisions its development.
In general yours and the comments of others about extending the scope of QVM seem reasonable, and there seems to be a consensus that this is not a general linear algebra library, which addresses my biggest concern about extensions: I don't want the library to lose focus or to become less lean. Do you think you could come up with a formal list of additional operations that you think should be part of the library? Thanks, Emil