----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul A. Bristow" <pbristow@hetp.u-net.com> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 10:59 AM Subject: Re: [boost] [chrono] review version Excellent - I hope we can get this reviewed and into a release Real Soon Now. Paul PS Some nits I think you are missing an @ below: Appendix B: Rationale See [http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2008/n2661.htm N2661 - A Foundation to Sleep On] And I think Andrew? got a poor thanks for his efforts - or they we e not enough ;-) "Thanks to Adrew Chinoff for his help polishing the documentation." 3. __high_precisionclock_ is missing a _? constexpr don't used for min(), max() and zero() - 'don't' should be 'isn't'? _______________________________________________ In principle the review will start the 6th November, if accepted I will try to push both Boost.Ratio and Boost.Chrono for 1.46 and let the review of Boost.Stopwatch for next year. Andrew help me a lot on the part that now is Boost.Stopwatch. I will don't forget to thank him when Boost.Stopwatches will be reviewed ;-) Thanks for signaling the documentation issues. Best, Vicente