On Thursday 24 April 2008 21:22, Daniel Frey wrote:
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 23:20 +0200, Daniel Frey wrote:
Peter, shall I write a patch for the documentation for get_shared_count() and the new ctors? Or would you like to take care of that?
I prepared a patch for the documentation. While doing that, I noticed that the current ctor is a template ctor, which it should not be. Is:
What's the point of documenting an unspecified reference counter type? Following the interface specified by the docs, the only thing you can do with get_shared_count() is pass its return value directly to the constructor that takes a shared_count. That adds nothing over the aliasing constructor. You can't store the return value in a shared_count, because it's an unspecified type. -- Frank