"Stefan Slapeta" <stefan@slapeta.com> wrote in message news:c1264r$hor$1@sea.gmane.org...
Michael Glassford wrote:
Though I've only built and used the Win32 version of Boost.Thread so far, it sounds as if static library support should at least be aded back for non-Win32 platforms, which don't have the dynamic library requirement. Is that correct?
I'm not sure if I understood correctly what you mean.
Sorry. I meant two things: 1) Boost.Thread requires a dynamic library to fix a Win32 problem. 2) Someone, earlier in this thread, I believe, pointed out that the ability to compile Boost.Thread as a static lib had been removed on non-Win32 platforms for no reason. I was suggesting that, if both these facts are true, support for compiling Boost.Thread as a static library should at least be added back for non-Win32 platforms.
Stefan
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost