Paul A Bristow wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Tobias Schwinger Sent: 01 August 2007 23:50 To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] [x-files] the code's out there...
<snip>
Not disgreeing with what you say, but clearly there isn't a consensus on changing the review process - probably because people are rightly busy with much more important, and difficult issues like SVN and the new release systems.
Does any of the suggestions we've discussed really require the review process to be changed? For my part, I don't think so: I have some more potential "X-files" in the pipeline and once they're all boostified I will just request formal review for /one/ library, simply because I'm not bold enough to ask for five (or so) fast-track reviews at once ;-). Pre-reviewing could also be organized separately: In fact, there has been a post on this list recently, offering proofreading for documentation, which seems to be a step into that direction. Regards, Tobias