-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/31/2010 02:35 PM, Steven Watanabe wrote:
i see i'm too lazy too consult the standard but still i think it's a good idea to define compile time constants as enum members
can you clear this question for me once and forever, Steven? is it preferable or is it solely a matter of taste?
static const size_t is usually better because it has the correct type, and so will behave better for overload resolution.
Exactly my point. But while we're on the subject: considering that those are in a namespace (so they don't pollute the global namespace), and are constants, is there any particular reason to use or not use "static" in the declarations? - -- Chad Nelson Oak Circle Software, Inc. * * * -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuz6J8ACgkQp9x9jeZ9/wQ4IQCgy3lZdFFzpveZw0PgLamsntEl A2MAn2odOrwWxPCxc3lB9T75YV4MiiRh =cdqg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----