On Mar 19, 2008, at 9:42 AM, Beman Dawes wrote:
For a full list of 1.35.0 test regressions, see http://beta.boost.org/development/tests/release/developer/summary.html
Or, better yet: http://beta.boost.org/development/tests/release/developer/issues.html
There are a few 1.35.0 regressions I'm not particularly concerned about; VC++ 7.1 is now old news, and no one seems to care much about the Intel/Windows compiler.
Given that VC++ 9.0 has been out for awhile now, it would be nice to kill off a few more of those regressions before 1.35.0 ships:
* Graph
As Richard Webb noted, it fails for the same reason as VC++ 8.0 fails, so we should just mark this as "expected" as well. Okay for me to go ahead and do that on the trunk and release branch?
Red regressions I'm concerned about are:
* Numeric/interval on Darwin. * Serialization on Darwin.
This is the trivial patch to fix the Serialization failures on Darwin: Index: libs/serialization/example/portable_binary_oarchive.hpp =================================================================== --- libs/serialization/example/portable_binary_oarchive.hpp (revision 43724) +++ libs/serialization/example/portable_binary_oarchive.hpp (working copy) @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ public: friend class boost::archive::basic_binary_oarchive<portable_binary_oarchive>; friend class boost::archive::save_access; #endif - void save_impl(const long l){ + void save_impl(long l){ long ll = l; char size = 0; if(l < 0){ Tested on Darwin (both PowerPC and Intel); shall I commit to the trunk and the release branch? - Doug