Re: [boost] Report from Mont Tremblant C++ Committee meeting

David Abrahams wrote:

This isn't about whose fault it was. I'm not gonna play the blame game ;-)

Come on. You're spoiling all the fun ;-)

I'm just wondering, for those listening, whether the deep-copying smart pointers often used for the pimpl idiom raise the same concerns.

Good point. I am still unconvinced that the syntax for value access is a good indicator for a type's copy semantics. auto_ptr anybody? Thomas -- Thomas Witt witt@acm.org