Le lun 01/03/2004 à 18:11, David Abrahams a écrit :
Guillaume Melquiond <guillaume.melquiond@ens-lyon.fr> writes:
Le lun 01/03/2004 à 16:58, Beman Dawes a écrit :
Looking at the results, there is lots of good news. Tests now passing, warnings removed, etc. But there are also regressions in a number of libraries:
Interval - Borland, VC++ 6.0, and VC++ 7.0 regressions.
I already reported these failures to the list two weeks ago so that anybody interested could take a look. There were no answer so the library has been marked as unusable with these compilers in the status/explicit-failures-markup.xml. It doesn't appear in your regression logs; but in Metacomm's summaries it appears clearly.
Hopefully the developers will take a look at these soon so the regressions don't hang around until the next release.
I don't intend to fix them. The library doesn't use any complex C++ construction (even Borland 5.5 is able to compile it)
Read above again. Borland is listed as failing.
Read above again. It's Borland 5.6.4 that fails, not Borland 5.5.1 (according to Beman's and Metacomm's regression logs). So as I said, even Borland 5.5 is able to compile it. Regards, Guillaume