
14 Mar
2011
14 Mar
'11
3:15 p.m.
Chad Nelson wrote:
I have yet to see any other objection to my focus on unlimited-size integers for an unlimited-size integer library.
That's odd, because my very first posts in this review focused on your code's unacceptably-poor performance for fixed-size integers. Here's what I wrote in my review: "Performance of small and fixed-length integers is poor. This could be resolved by storing fixed-length values on the stack, or by using some sort of small buffer optimisation." Phil.