3 Jun
2006
3 Jun
'06
12:22 p.m.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Witt" <witt@acm.org>
Please tell me if you think there are serious omissions or something should not be on the list. Please note that a library maintainer may always decide to mark the more esoteric platforms (for any suitable definition for 'more esoteric') as expected failures.
It would be nice to officially support 64-bit windows (msvc-8.0_x86_64 and intel-win-9.1_x86_64?). Sean