on Fri Aug 09 2013, "Jens Weller"
Some feedback:
libraries.xml as a lib name source is nice, but not quite perfect. I've seen different results from maintainers.txt and libraries.xml. As maintainers.txt also libraries.xml contains duplicates, some of its library names don't fit the expectation of bcp, so I applied some fixes for this in my program.
The Dependency filter is yet not perfect, especially in detection.
More details about this version and the download for it at my blog: http://www.meetingcpp.com/index.php/br/items/releasing-boost-dependency-anal...
kind regards,
A bunch of dependency analysis code is checked in to Ryppl. https://github.com/ryppl/ryppl/tree/develop/scripts About a year ago I used it to make these graphs which I think are more informative than the ones I see on your blog. http://f.cl.ly/items/343N460u3b3039091C0g/deps.pdf http://f.cl.ly/items/0v201A0A33152G1u0u0v/deps.pdf http://f.cl.ly/items/3V2I3A103K1Y45113s3w/source-deps.pdf http://f.cl.ly/items/2r2Z1E3X1o1m2k0N321G/boost-all-deps-reduced.svg Of course, I don't remember anymore what the color coding and line styles signify, but that information is probably easily extracted from the source code. -- Dave Abrahams